• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

News Russell Brand sued for £220,000 for failing to write two self-help books

Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.

AgentPete

Capo Famiglia
Guardian
Full Member
Joined
May 19, 2014
Location
London UK
LitBits
0
United-Nations
A lot of interesting points arising in this...

Russell Brand is reportedly being sued for £200,000 after failing to write two self help books, in a deal that was signed before he was accused of sex abuse by four women.

Book magnates Pan Macmillan are said to have commissioned two self-help books from the disgraced comedian in 2021, offering him a total of £575,000 for 'two original literary works of non-fiction'.

Brand, 49, is said to have received £75,000 upfront for his first book and £142,000 for his second - with the remaining £179,500 due after he had finished the manuscripts and completed the surrounding promotional work.

But the publishing giant reportedly terminated his contract after a series of women accused him of sexual assaults. He denies the allegations and claims the relationships were consensual.

Now Pan Macmillan has filed to reclaim £220,000 of 'wasted expenditure' from Brand and his company, Pablo Diablo's Legitimate Business Firm, The Times report.
 
I can’t see any news update on this,although it may take a while to grind through the courts. If anyone has seen anything newer, please post.

@E G Logan - PM seem to be simply claiming return of monies paid under a contract that they say Brand breached and did not rectify. Other contingent claims might be harder to substantiate, i.e. since they never received those manuscripts, they didn’t incur editing costs, etc.

Brand was a big deal for them at one point, e.g.:


It will be an interesting case to follow…
 

Latest Articles By Litopians

  • Advertising and Social Media
    There has been much discussion in writing circles about how much a writer has to self-promote these ...
  • Future Abstract: Fights at Night
    SATIRE ALERT: The following abstract is entirely fictional and does not represent actual events or s ...
  • Great Novel Openings Quiz
    As writers, we all know how important it is to grip the reader from the very start. Intriguing, surp ...
  • In The Summertime
    In the early seventies, I had a semi-Afro hairstyle and a shaggy beard. . I thought I looked like th ...
  • Working with a Literary Agent
    The Querying In a previous post I mentioned that I was back in the query trenches. To recap, my earl ...
  • Danger! Danger!
    What is perhaps the most feared creature of the Borneo rainforest, I hear you ask? Who is the King o ...
  • The World Has Missed You
         May 2021… COVID lockdown restrictions had eased, so Mrs Treaclechops and I headed to the I ...
Back
Top