• Café Life is the Colony's main hangout, watering hole and meeting point.

    This is a place where you'll meet and make writing friends, and indulge in stratospherically-elevated wit or barometrically low humour.

    Some Colonists pop in religiously every day before or after work. Others we see here less regularly, but all are equally welcome. Two important grounds rules…

    • Don't give offence
    • Don't take offence

    We now allow political discussion, but strongly suggest it takes place in the Steam Room, which is a private sub-forum within Café Life. It’s only accessible to Full Members.

    You can dismiss this notice by clicking the "x" box

News Russell Brand sued for £220,000 for failing to write two self-help books

Invest in You. Get Full Membership now.

AgentPete

Capo Famiglia
Guardian
Full Member
Joined
May 19, 2014
Location
London UK
LitBits
5
United-Nations
A lot of interesting points arising in this...

Russell Brand is reportedly being sued for £200,000 after failing to write two self help books, in a deal that was signed before he was accused of sex abuse by four women.

Book magnates Pan Macmillan are said to have commissioned two self-help books from the disgraced comedian in 2021, offering him a total of £575,000 for 'two original literary works of non-fiction'.

Brand, 49, is said to have received £75,000 upfront for his first book and £142,000 for his second - with the remaining £179,500 due after he had finished the manuscripts and completed the surrounding promotional work.

But the publishing giant reportedly terminated his contract after a series of women accused him of sexual assaults. He denies the allegations and claims the relationships were consensual.

Now Pan Macmillan has filed to reclaim £220,000 of 'wasted expenditure' from Brand and his company, Pablo Diablo's Legitimate Business Firm, The Times report.
 
I can’t see any news update on this,although it may take a while to grind through the courts. If anyone has seen anything newer, please post.

@E G Logan - PM seem to be simply claiming return of monies paid under a contract that they say Brand breached and did not rectify. Other contingent claims might be harder to substantiate, i.e. since they never received those manuscripts, they didn’t incur editing costs, etc.

Brand was a big deal for them at one point, e.g.:


It will be an interesting case to follow…
 

Further Articles from the Author Platform

Latest Articles By Litopians

  • Another Night in A&E (Part 2)
    My husband has not had a full-blown stroke.  He has more than likely had a TIA.  He is feeling bet ...
  • Another Night in A&E (Part 1)
    Back in March, I regaled you all with tales of the bizarre night time world of the emergency departm ...
  • Tired Old Characterizations
    I’m tired of stereotypical behaviors from characters, both in books and on television or at the mo ...
  • The Binturong Problem
    If I told you I’d seen a binturong, chances are you’d stare at me blankly. What if I told you Iâ ...
  • Lives Well Lived
    My friend, Stan, has his 100th birthday this August. His family are arranging a birthday party and w ...
  • Parental Advisory
    Mid-November 2024. In a brightly lit maternity ward somewhere near Birmingham, England, a young boy ...
  • Joyous Enemies!
    “We have an unexpected class starting tomorrow. Do you want it? Three weeks. Five hours a day, Mon ...
Back
Top